Prediction of creep failure time using machine learning
If materials are loaded well below their limit capabilities over extended periods, failure by damage accumulation and localization can still occur in a phenomenon known as creep failure. If this happens, a material can fail catastrophically and unexpectedly, which is especially dangerous in civil structures holding loads for long periods, such as, e.g. bridges or damns. Creep failure has also been related to natural catastrophic events such as landslides, cliff collapses, and some earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. As shown in this other work, it’s possible to find so-called precursors of failure: statistical changes in a material’s plastic deformation activity that tells us that failure is coming. However, such statistical changes might occur abruptly, and they might not be clearly distinguishable from noise. The relevant question is, to which extent is it possible to use the precursors to predict a possibly imminent catastrophic material failure? If possible, can we do it early enough to prevent it?
A material deforming under creep conditions, and eventually approaching failure. Left: strain-time curve; Right: spatial map of plastic strain.
Plastic deformation exhibits a complex and stochastic behavior with correlations in space and time, and much information is encoded in such correlations. By applying classical statistical methods, it will be tough to exploit all that information. However, dealing with complex multidimensional and correlated data in an automated way is what machine learning excels at.
In this work, we applied a Random Forest regression algorithm that automatically learns and exploits spatio-temporal correlations in deformation activity. With this model, we estimated as a function of time the remaining time to failure of many samples. The model is trained and evaluated with synthetic datasets produced by the stochastic model introduced in this other work. We first addressed whether predicting a material’s upcoming failure is possible. This question is of great importance, with implications even for earthquake predictability. Moreover, we studied how different material properties and conditions can affect failure predictability. For example, what’s the role of the material’s structural heterogeneity, the temperature, the loading conditions, or the material’s sample size? We found that the machine learning model can predict the approach to failure with higher accuracy than other, more classical methods proposed in the scientific literature. In addition, we found that the remaining time to failure is predictable with a different degree of accuracy that depends on the distance to such time, the material properties, and the loading conditions. Among those, the local strength heterogeneity is a crucial parameter in producing safer materials since it leads to a less abrupt approach to failure. Such behavior means that an upcoming failure can be identified easier and with higher anticipation, which is crucial for safety reasons. Lastly, we found that the bigger a material sample is, the more difficult it is to predict failure. Unfortunately, this might be bad news for earthquake predictability.
In summary, our proof-of-concept study suggests the possibility of training machine learning models on synthetic data to learn the statistical signatures of material failure. Furthermore, using synthetic data for model training can help overcome the scarcity of experimental data since, by definition, reaching failure implies the destruction of the object under study. A trained model could then be deployed in real-world settings to find early-warning signals of failure hidden in the deformation activity of a structure or the earth’s crust.
Featured Images
These are some selected images from the project and the article:
Article Abstract
A subcritical load on a disordered material can induce creep damage. The creep rate in this case exhibits three temporal regimes viz. an initial decelerating regime followed by a steady-state regime and a stage of accelerating creep that ultimately leads to catastrophic breakdown. Due to the statistical regularities in the creep rate, the time evolution of creep rate has often been used to predict residual lifetime until catastrophic breakdown. However, in disordered samples, these efforts met with limited success. Nevertheless, it is clear that as the failure is approached, the damage become increasingly spatially correlated, and the spatio-temporal patterns of acoustic emission, which serve as a proxy for damage accumulation activity, are likely to mirror such correlations. However, due to the high dimensionality of the data and the complex nature of the correlations it is not straightforward to identify the said correlations and thereby the precursory signals of failure. Here we use supervised machine learning to estimate the remaining time to failure of samples of disordered materials. The machine learning algorithm uses as input the temporal signal provided by a mesoscale elastoplastic model for the evolution of creep damage in disordered solids. Machine learning algorithms are well-suited for assessing the proximity to failure from the time series of the acoustic emissions of sheared samples. We show that materials are relatively more predictable for higher disorder while are relatively less predictable for larger system sizes. We find that machine learning predictions, in the vast majority of cases, perform substantially better than other prediction approaches proposed in the literature.
S. Biswas, D. F. Castellanos & M. Zaiser
Scientific Reports volume 10, 16910 (2020)
About
2020
By S. Biswas, D. F. Castellanos & M. Zaiser